Search
Home » Expert Columns » Digital Cameras » Are you ready for a DSLR?
Are you ready for a DSLR?
The advantage of a DSLR is the ability to change lenses but that has its pros and cons too
Apr 24, 2008
Sujith Gopinath,
Editorial Consultant

Until some time ago, casual photographers could not dream of buying a digital SLR. Having played around with megapixels for quite some time, now almost all major camera manufacturers such as Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Sony and Pentax are battling it out in a tough turf that once remained the bastion of professionals—the DSLR space. And this battle, subsequently, has brought the prices of DSLRs down to affordable levels, threatening the prosumer’s mantle. This, in turn, is compelling casual and home photographers to rethink their prosumer camera choices. My opinion is instead of wading through unknown waters, one needs to be aware of the pros and cons of a DSLR before choosing it over a prosumer.

The most obvious advantage of a DSLR is the ability to change lenses to suit our various needs. But why do we need to change lenses when we get a super zoom at a much cheaper price? For example, most prosumers typically come with a 36-432mm lens with an average price tag of around Rs 20,000. But a DSLR comes with a kit lens of 28-80mm focal length (17-55mm in APS-format). So to match the focal length of prosumers, you need at least an additional 105-450mm (70-300mm in APS-format) for your DSLR. The cheapest and lowest quality lenses in this range will cost you at least Rs10,000. But the changeability of lenses is, in fact, a blessing for professionals who are ready to spend some money on specialist lenses. These lenses come in the range of Rs 20,000 to a few lakhs, depending on the level of sophistication of the lenses and again, these lenses tend to be very bulky and heavy.

Changing DSLR lenses has its share of problems. For example, the act of changing the lens exposes the sensor to dust and other extremes of environment. Professional photographers know how difficult it is to protect their equipment from dust and fungus in Indian conditions. But in the case of prosumer cameras, since the lens is fixed, there is no chance for dust or fungus to enter the sensor. This is very important to know especially if you do not use the camera very frequently. A DSLR lens is more likely to catch fungus than the lenses of compacts because of the coatings and lubricants used for the construction of composite lenses.

Also read:

A day in Hyderabad with my Nikon D40
              
Ads by Google
POST A COMMENT
Name:
City:
Email:
 
Comments
Dear Sujith<br />
This is an excellent article for even for professional photographer, who is buying DSLR even if he is actually not required it. I have connection with lot of photographers mainly they shot wedding, indoor photos such passport size photos etc. For these kind of scenarios they dont need Nikon D80 or even Canon 400D. I think for for almost all wedding photography Canon S5-IS or equivalent camera is more than enough. Can shoot portraits, close-ups using tele mode full manual controls etc. They are getting really good zoom range also 30-435mm. Can put external flash unit also in these types of camera.
Ramesh  |  May 23,2008
Also i have heard that the usage / inter portability of lens between film based SLR and DSLR. it should cover this also. The compare India really does not compare within the various models, needs to be more user friendly.
sandeep  |  Apr 28,2008
Dear Sujith,
Very good article for amateurs who has to take a decision on the type of camera to purchase. I went through the same situation about 6 months back and settled for a prosumer camera(Olympus SP560 UZ) and am extremely happy with the results and also with the decision. But I am dissappointed that it did not find any mention in your list of best prosumers even though Olympus was the first to have the 18x zoom and the 1 cm super macro apart from a host of other features.
Madhavan  |  Apr 25,2008
The comparison is good enough as far as digital cameras are concerned. But as a professional why dont you post the pros and cons in comparison to a analog camera, wherein the actual/the real photographers vision comes out. To be precise as u all are aware & quot; photography is the art of utilizing the available light in a best manner & quot; now that these digital cams have nothing to do with this, there is no point in discussing about them and rather why dont we as professionals develop the & quot; Art of Photography" by using the Analog cameras and c to it that the actual art of photography does not die.I want every body to remember that Art cannot be purchased. It has to be learned. Because of digital cams, and Because of good purchasing power in India, every Tom-Dicka and Harry are becoming photographers, thereby Killing the professionalism involved.
B.Kishore Kumar  |  Apr 25,2008
The advantages and disadvantages weren't very clearly specified. the article wasn't really coherent.
sonal  |  Apr 24,2008
ADS BY GOOGLE
Ads by Google
Copyright © 2007 - Compare India - Comparison shopping & consumer buying guide